Boat Stone 1500 Vs JBL Charge 3 Full Comparison

Compare the price, color, speaker type, sound quality, connectivity options, Bluetooth version, Bluetooth range, battery capacity, charging time, playback time, warranty, microphone, waterproof, and lots more features of boat stone 1500 vs JBL Charge 3 from the below comparison table.


Boat stone 1500 vs JBL Charge 3 comparison table


Model Boat stone 1500 JBL Charge 3
Launch Year NA NA
Price ₹ 6,990 Check Current Price ₹ 8,999 Check Current Price
Color
Speaker Type Stereo 40W + Baas radiators Stereo 20W + Baas radiators
HD Sound Yes Yes
Connectivity Bluetooth, Aux Port, USB Port Bluetooth,  Aux Port, USB Port
Bluetooth Range 10 M 10 M
Bluetooth Version V4.2 V4.1
Battery Type Lithium Lithium
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging Time 4.5 hours 4.5 hours
Playback Time 15 hours 20 hours
Water-Resistant Yes IPX6 Yes IPX7
Microphone Yes Yes
Physical Buttons Yes Yes
Virtual Assistant No Yes (Google Assistant & Siri)
Weight 3 kg 800 g
Warranty 1 Year 1 Year
Return Under 7 days Under 7 days
Free Shipping Yes Yes
Service Center Yes Check Here Yes Check Here

Boat stone 1500 vs JBL charge 3 ratings & review


Boat stone 1500 rating & review


Boat stone 1500 review

JBL Charge 3 rating & review


JBL Charge 3 review

Boat stone 1500 and JBL Charge 3 specification


Price and color


The boat stone 1500 Bluetooth speaker is available in the Indian market at Rs 7,000 and it comes in four colors red, black, blue, and dark green.

While the JBL Charge 3 Bluetooth speaker is available for almost Rs 9,000 and comes in red, blue, gray, and black colors.

Both of these Bluetooth speakers are available in various online stores and e-commerce websites.

Also read: JBL Flip 5 Vs Boat stone 1500 Full Comparison


Speaker type and sound quality


The boat stone 1500 comes with a 40-watt stereo speaker and passive bass radiators, making this Bluetooth speaker better than JBL Charge 3 Bluetooth speaker.

Since the JBL charge 3 comes with only a 20-watt stereo speaker and bass radiators.

The sound quality of both the Bluetooth speakers is 100% HD and clear while the bass of both the speakers is mind-blowing.

If you play these speakers in a room, you will feel the actual power of their bass.

Connectivity options, Bluetooth Version, and connectivity range


As for connectivity options, the boat stone 1500 comes with an Aux port, a USB Port, and a Bluetooth whose maximum connectivity range is up to 10 meters and its version is v4.2.

While the JBL Charge 3 also comes with the above-mentioned connectivity options whose maximum Bluetooth connectivity range is up to 10 meters and its Bluetooth version is v4.1.

Also read: JBL Xtreme Vs Charge 3 Full Comparison


Battery type, Charging time, and playback time


The Boat stone 1500 Bluetooth speaker is powered by a 4000 mAh lithium-ion battery which takes almost 4.5 hours to fully charge and lasts for up to 15 hours.

While the JBL Charge 3 Bluetooth speaker is powered with a 6000 mAh lithium-ion battery that takes almost 4.5 hours to fully charge and plays non-stop songs for up to 20 hours.

Waterproof, microphone, and virtual assistant


The boat stone 1500 is an IPX6 certified waterproof Bluetooth speaker while the JBL Charge 3 is an IPX7 certified Bluetooth speaker.

Both the Bluetooth speaker comes with a built-in microphone that can be used in calling.

And if we compare the virtual assistant availability, the boat stone 1500 has no virtual assistant while the JBL Charge 3 comes with a built-in google assistant and Siri assistant.

Also read: Boat Stone 1500 Vs JBL Charge 4 Full Comparison


Weight, warranty, and service centers


The boat stone 1500 Bluetooth speaker weighs around 3 kg while the JBL Charge 3 weighs around 1 kg.

Both the Bluetooth speaker comes with one year of warranty and their service center is available in almost every state of India.

Also, users can claim a warranty by visiting their official website and checking the service center's list.

Pros and cons of boat stone 1500 and JBL charge 3


Boat stone 1500 pros and cons


Pros

  1. More color options
  2. 40-watt stereo speaker
  3. Dual bass radiators
  4. 4000 mAh battery
  5. 15 hours of playback time

    Cons

    1. Bluetooth version is not the latest
    2. Not an IPX7 certified
    3. No virtual assistant
    4. Heavy weighted

      Also read: JBL Xtreme 2 Vs Boat Stone 1500 Full Comparison


      JBL Charge 3 pros and cons


      Pros

      1. 20-watt stereo speaker
      2. Powerful bass radiators
      3. More color choice
      4. 6000 mAh battery
      5. 20 hours of playback time
      6. IPX7 certified
      7. Inbuilt virtual assistant support
      8. Powerbank feature

        Cons

        1. The Bluetooth version should be v5.0

        FAQ related to JBL Charge 3


        Is JBL Charge 3 Mono Or Stereo?


        The JBL Charge 3 is a 20-watt stereo Bluetooth speaker.

        Can JBL Charge 3 use as a power bank?


        Yes, it can be used as a power bank since it comes with a 6000 mAh lithium-ion battery.

        Can we use a OnePlus 5 charger to charge JBL Clip 3?


        Yes, you can charge the JBL Charge 3 Bluetooth speaker with a OnePlus 5 charger or even other mobile chargers too.

        Also read: Boat Stone 1500 Vs JBL Xtreme Full Comparison


        Conclusion


        From the above comparison, it is clear that the boat stone 1500 Bluetooth speaker is better than the JBL Charge 3 Bluetooth speaker.

        So, if you are planning to buy these, I suggest you buy the boat stone 1500 Bluetooth speaker, not the JBL Charge 3.

        And in the last, I hope this post boat stone 1500 vs JBL Charge 3 will help you in making clear buying decisions.
        Akash singh

        Hello readers, my name is Akash Singh, I'm the owner and author of this blog. The main aim of this blog is to help people in making a great buying decision. You can join me on social media! facebook

        I strongly suggest you, don't post fake and spam comments. Share only your genuine thoughts or suggestions.

        Post a Comment (0)
        Previous Post Next Post